<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Many Advertising Agencies Don’t Know About Copywriting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordnerds.com.au/2009/05/what-many-advertising-agencies-don%e2%80%99t-know-about-copywriting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordnerds.com.au/2009/05/what-many-advertising-agencies-don%e2%80%99t-know-about-copywriting/</link>
	<description>Copywriting, Business Writing, Speech Writing, Editing and Proofreading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 21:29:30 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.wordnerds.com.au/2009/05/what-many-advertising-agencies-don%e2%80%99t-know-about-copywriting/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordnerds.com.au/?p=254#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Nancy, for your comments.

I agree with your points. Some people seem to think complicated writing shows that they are intelligent and sophisticated. We&#039;ve had a few clients who didn&#039;t get the point and said our writing was too simple. It&#039;s usually more challenging to explain something in a simple and succinct way. Mark Twain summed it up when he wrote, &#039;I didn&#039;t have time to write you a short letter, so I wrote you a long one instead&#039;. 

Flesch-Kincaid scores are an easy way to measure the readability of your writing. I am surprised when I meet people who work in corporate communications and have never heard about readability scales. The concept isn&#039;t taught in public relations or marketing programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Nancy, for your comments.</p>
<p>I agree with your points. Some people seem to think complicated writing shows that they are intelligent and sophisticated. We&#8217;ve had a few clients who didn&#8217;t get the point and said our writing was too simple. It&#8217;s usually more challenging to explain something in a simple and succinct way. Mark Twain summed it up when he wrote, &#8216;I didn&#8217;t have time to write you a short letter, so I wrote you a long one instead&#8217;. </p>
<p>Flesch-Kincaid scores are an easy way to measure the readability of your writing. I am surprised when I meet people who work in corporate communications and have never heard about readability scales. The concept isn&#8217;t taught in public relations or marketing programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancy Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.wordnerds.com.au/2009/05/what-many-advertising-agencies-don%e2%80%99t-know-about-copywriting/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordnerds.com.au/?p=254#comment-171</guid>
		<description>It SHOULD be basic information for copywriters...but wayyyy too much copy has &quot;you&quot; as the indirect object and &quot;product/service&quot; as the subject. I see things like  &quot;Product saves you time.&quot; when it would be so much more compelling to say &quot;You/Save/Time (with this product). 

Yes it SHOULD be something obvious for writers--but it ISN&#039;T! Fully 60% of what comes out of my agency is copy that sounds like &quot;let us tell you about us&quot;. And that&#039;s the way our clients think it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It SHOULD be basic information for copywriters&#8230;but wayyyy too much copy has &#8220;you&#8221; as the indirect object and &#8220;product/service&#8221; as the subject. I see things like  &#8220;Product saves you time.&#8221; when it would be so much more compelling to say &#8220;You/Save/Time (with this product). </p>
<p>Yes it SHOULD be something obvious for writers&#8211;but it ISN&#8217;T! Fully 60% of what comes out of my agency is copy that sounds like &#8220;let us tell you about us&#8221;. And that&#8217;s the way our clients think it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.wordnerds.com.au/2009/05/what-many-advertising-agencies-don%e2%80%99t-know-about-copywriting/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordnerds.com.au/?p=254#comment-131</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most facile and selfserving articles I&#039;ve ever read. What you say is complete rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most facile and selfserving articles I&#8217;ve ever read. What you say is complete rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
